Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites Again
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites
Edmonds and Warburton: Philosophy Bites Back
Your email address:Powered by FeedBlitz
« Galen Strawson on the Sense of Self |
| Links to Past Episodes »
Is our phenomenal experience unified? Philosopher of mind Tim Bayne investigates this tricky question in conversation with Nigel Warburton for this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.
Listen to Tim Bayne on the Unity of Consciousness
Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.
Posted at 10:15 PM in Mind, Neuroscience | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516cc769e2017d3d87688c970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tim Bayne on the Unity of Consciousness:
It would be interesting to ask dr. Bayne how his idea of the consciousnes being structured and his critique of the the theory of experiences corresponding to neurophysiological events in the brain can be compared to Maurice Merealu-Pontys arguments in Phenomenology of Perception.
November 13, 2012 at 10:28 AM
Excellent interview! Yes, that whole Merleau-Ponty Chiasm thing of simultaneously touching and being touched - we as "flesh" are both subject and object, which is a kind of Cartesian disunity of our consciousness.
It made me think too of M-Ps concept of obtaining "maximal grip" of the world through our perceptions - our consciousness functionally operating as a unifying process. So, each cortical system attempts to get maximal grip of the incoming sense data, which is increasingly integrated by the higher centres to reveal the significance to the organism of the whole, as a single unified understanding (which can then flip figure-ground as in the "duck-rabbit" of the Philosophy Bites logo).
I wondered about DID cases, where multiple conscious part personalities are in the same body, often unaware of each other. It seems that memory and personality is compartmentalised. Is there some anatomical correlate in the brain, or is it like two "operating systems" running in parallel?
Jim Vaughan |
November 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
(URLs automatically linked.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Basics
Nigel Warburton: A Little History of Philosophy
Nigel Warburton: Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction
Nigel Warburton: The Basics of Essay Writing
Nigel Warburton: Thinking from A to Z
Nigel Warburton: Erno Goldfinger: The Life of an Architect
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Essential Study Guide
Nigel Warburton: The Art Question
Nigel Warburton: Freedom: An Introduction with Readings
Nigel Warburton: Philosophy: The Classics
David Edmonds: Would You Kill the Fat Man?
David Edmonds: Caste Wars: The Philosophy of Discrimination
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Rousseau's Dog: A Tale of Two Philosophers
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Bobby Fischer Goes to War
David Edmonds and John Eidinow: Wittgenstein's Poker