Hate speech can be vile and psychologically damaging. Should it be tolerated? Rae Langton explores the nature of hate speech and the question of whether laws protecting free expression should allow it in conversation with Nigel Warburton.
Listen to Rae Langton on Hate Speech
Philosophy Bites is made in association with the Institute of Philosophy.
We're all very aware that "hate speech" is hurtful, even damaging. But giving any government the power to censor based on such subjective criteria is an invitation to tyranny. The cure is far worse than the disease.
Posted by: Marcello | August 06, 2012 at 03:17 PM
But providing any govt the energy to censor depending on such very subjective requirements is an party invitation to tyranny. The treat is far more intense than the condition.
Posted by: orlando seo | August 09, 2012 at 06:54 PM
Far from protecting groups "lower down in the hierarchy", Hate Speech laws in England have clearly disadvantaged the working classes, disproportionately. They as a group have traditionally earned their living by their physical labour and not with their linguistic skills. In contrast, the middle-classes (or polite society) earn their living by developing the speech of masked communication - where uncomfortable truths are discouraged, skated around, and mealy-mouthed communication is fostered instead.
Posted by: Lynngracecorbin | August 21, 2012 at 02:13 PM